Hello

Welcome to Kenyan Lawyer blog, an informative and educative blogs that is meant to educate and inform you on legal development in Kenya and on business issues. You can reach me via mainacy@gmail.com.
Karibu sana.

Friday, May 30, 2025

Understanding Share Forfeiture in Kenya: Legal Framework, Key Case Law, and Procedural Compliance


Introduction

Share forfeiture in Kenya, governed by the Companies Act, 2015, Companies (General) Regulations, 2015, and relevant Kenyan case law, is a complex and highly regulated process. When improperly handled, forfeiture can result in severe legal consequences, including forfeiture nullification, shareholder claims of oppression, director liability, and reputational damage.

This article comprehensively outlines the legal foundations, critical procedural steps, compliance requirements, potential risks, and actionable recommendations for companies considering share forfeiture. It also highlights how CM Advocates LLP can assist in ensuring legal compliance and mitigating risks.

Legal Framework and Key Case Law

Statutory Provisions

Section 33(1), Companies Act, 2015: Share forfeiture must be explicitly authorized in the company’s Articles of Association (AoA). Without such authority, the forfeiture is ultra vires and void.

Section 34, Companies Act, 2015: Governs the process and consequences of forfeiture, including the ongoing liability of former shareholders and post-forfeiture formalities.

Regulation 75, Companies (General) Regulations, 2015: Outlines procedural requirements for issuing call notices initiating forfeiture.

Model Articles of Association (Table H, Fourth Schedule):

  • Article 21: Authorizes forfeiture for non-payment of call monies.
  • Articles 22–25: Detail notice requirements, board resolution processes, and the effects of forfeiture.

Relevant Kenyan Case Law

  1. Republic v Registrar of Companies [2023] eKLR: Reinforces that procedural defects, such as defective notices, can render forfeiture actions void.
  2. Kinuthia v Blue Valley Enterprises Ltd [2018] eKLR: Emphasizes strict compliance with notice content and service procedures.
  3. John Nduati Kariuki v Standard Chartered Financial Services Ltd [2006] eKLR: Courts prioritize shareholder protection and procedural integrity, ensuring due process is followed during forfeiture.

Detailed Step-by-Step Forfeiture Procedure in Kenya

1.   Pre-Forfeiture Compliance

  • Review of AoA: Confirm that the AoA includes a forfeiture clause mirroring Model Articles Table H (Articles 21–25). Without this, the forfeiture is ultra vires under Section 33(1).
  •  Board Resolution: Pass a properly minuted board resolution authorizing the call for unpaid monies in compliance with Section 46 to protect directors from liability.

2. Issuing a Call Notice

  • Legal Basis: Regulation 75, Model Article 2
  • Contents: Must include the amount due, due date (minimum 14 days), interest rate, and warning of possible forfeiture.
  • Delivery: Serve by registered post and/or email as stipulated in the AoA. Archive delivery evidence for at least 7 years (Regulation 185).

3. Issuing the Forfeiture Notice

  • Legal Basis: Section 34(1), Model Article 23
  • Trigger: Default continues after the call notice deadline.
  • Contents: Final 14-day period for payment, stating:

"Shares will be forfeited if payment is not received by [insert date]."

  •  Delivery: Serve via both registered post and email, retaining documentation.

4. Executing the Forfeiture

  • Legal Basis: Section 34(2), Model Articles 24–25
  •  Pass a board resolution in a quorate meeting to resolve the forfeiture.
  •  Update the register of members to remove the defaulting shareholder.
  • Demand return and cancel the original share certificate(s).

5. Post-Forfeiture Obligations

- Legal Basis: Section 34(5)-(6), Model Article 26

  •  Former shareholders remain liable for unpaid call amounts, with interest and less resale proceeds.
  •  Shares can be reissued or canceled; public companies must cancel if not reissued within 3 years.
  •  File Form CR14 with the Registrar of Companies within 14 days of forfeiture or cancellation.

Risks and Legal Consequences

  1. Defective Notices: Incorrect content or delivery renders forfeiture void (Kinuthia case).
  2. AoA Non-Compliance: Absence of a forfeiture clause makes the action ultra vires and susceptible to claims under Section 786.
  3. Governance Failures: Improperly documented meetings or resolutions risk director liability under Section 46.
  4. Shareholder Claims: Disputes may result in reinstatement under Section 894 or claims for damages (John Nduati Kariuki case).

Recommended Actions for Companies

  • Audit AoA & Governance Records: Confirm and align with Model Articles Table H; update governance templates per Governance Standard GS 009.
  •  Dual-Track Notice Delivery: Serve notices via registered mail and email (with read receipts); archive evidence for compliance and potential litigation.
  •  Post-Forfeiture Actions: Issue demand letters within 30 days and file Form CR14 within 14 days.
  •  Legal Vetting & Risk Management: Obtain pre-issuance legal vetting of notices; consider mediation under Section 37 for disputes.

How CM Advocates LLP Can Assist

At CM Advocates LLP, we recognize that share forfeiture in Kenya is not only a compliance issue but also a governance challenge with potential legal liabilities. Our Corporate Department offers comprehensive support, including:

🔍 Compliance Audits: We review your AoA and governance records to ensure alignment with the Companies Act, 2015 and Model Articles Table H.

📜 Drafting and Vetting Services: We prepare and vet call notices, forfeiture notices, and board resolutions to ensure procedural compliance and legal defensibility.

👥 Director Training: We provide governance training for your board on forfeiture protocols, risks, and documentation best practices.

📞 Post-Forfeiture Support: We assist with filing Form CR14, managing shareholder communications, and mitigating potential disputes and litigation risks.


Conclusion and Next Steps

Share forfeiture in Kenya is a powerful but complex tool that demands strict adherence to legal requirements and procedural protocols. Failure to comply risks forfeiture nullification, shareholder claims, regulatory sanctions, and director liability.

🔍 CM Advocates LLP strongly recommends:

  • Pre-action legal review of your AoA and notice templates by our Corporate Department.
  • Governance training for directors on share forfeiture protocols and risks.
  • Timely filing of all required post-forfeiture forms and disclosures with the Registrar of Companies.

📞 Don’t wait—contact us today to schedule a compliance audit, initiate a governance review, and ensure your company’s forfeiture actions are legally sound, defensible, and executed with precision.

For immediate assistance and expert legal guidance, please contact:

Cyrus Maina – cmaina@cmadvocates.com

No comments:

Post a Comment